![]() Her persecutors have failed to destroy her in fact, it was during times of persecution that the Church grew more and more while the persecutors themselves, and those whom the Church would destroy, are the very ones who came to nothing… Again, errors have assailed her but in fact, the greater the number of errors that have arisen, the more has the truth been made manifest…. ![]() ![]() The Church has ever proved indestructible. Those who wish to destroy the Church or change its basic principles and dogma should keep in mind St. ![]() It’s time for both Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook to fess up. But this is now the “offense-of-the-week” with these communication giants, and it’s clearly not going to end until we get some legislation to help us. If this were a one-off incident at Facebook or Google or Twitter, then Christians could rightfully be accused of hypersensitivity and a lack of charity. “It was shocking, yes: God deigned to take on flesh and was 'obedient unto death, even death on a cross.' (Philippians 2:8),” it added. The college, in response, wrote, the Crucifixion does indeed fit those descriptions, as man "executed God." It was a depiction of a San Damiano Cross which the university used to promote its MA Theology and MA Catechetics and Evangelization programs. The social media giant also blocked ads for the movie Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer, labeling the film about the serial killer abortionist “political speech.”įacebook also banned a Franciscan University of Steubenville ad in April of this year writing: "Your image, video thumbnail or video can't contain shocking, sensational, or excessively violent content." Case in point, the company also has suspended Elizabeth Johnson’s account―a Christian editor of the blog known as “Activist Mommy.” She called gender confusion a mental illness and was immediately blocked. Facebook, Google and Twitter are among the many tech companies that have been accused of online censorship by conservatives. Would Facebook have been offended if Vishnu, the Hindu deity, was thusly depicted? What if Vishnu was kneeling before Christ―or Santa for that matter?īut this is only the tip of the insanely politically-correct iceberg. Was it Santa? Was it the Child Jesus? Was it the fact that they were both depicted together? Was it because Santa was paying homage to the Lord of the Universe? Was it because Facebook thought we were fat-shaming Santa? Was it because we didn’t point out that Santa might be gender dysphoric? I asked them what exactly was offensive to their censors. I wrote to Facebook Headquarters but they didn’t respond by time of publication. Facebook takes their cues from benighted groups like PolitiFact and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Coincidence or divine intervention? You decide.įacebook has had a long history of censoring Christian organizations and individuals, flagging our beliefs as being “hateful” or otherwise inappropriate, but it is their actions and inaction that is most accurately branded as hateful. The image was restored, interestingly, on the Feast of Saint Nicholas―the real Santa Claus. Users then had to click on a button to uncover the photo.Īfter LifeSiteNews wrote about this dunderheaded move, the story went viral.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |